The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On May 20, 2016, the Defendant employed a large pumps (F) with the subsidies from the Seoul Special Self-Governing Province on May 20, 2016, in front of the 225 Northbuk-do, the Defendant: (a) the victim C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) did not have employed a large pumps with the subsidies from the Province of Jeollabuk-do; (b) even though there was a court’s decision that the dismissal of D and E was justifiable; (c) the c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s f’s f’s f’s f’s c’s f’s c’s f’s f’s c’s f’s f’s c’s f’s c’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s c’s f’.

On May 23, 2016, May 24, 2016, May 26, 2016, May 26, 2016, May 27, 2016, May 30, 2016, May 30, 2016, May 31, 2016, and June 1, 2016, the Defendant conducted a demonstration, one person, at the same place, in the same manner.

The Defendant, in such a way as above, damaged C’s reputation by openly pointing false facts over 11 times.

2. The facts charged by the Defendant and the defense counsel are premised on the fact that the Defendant stated the content of the PPet in the name of “C does not use the financial subsidy received from the Province of Jeollabuk and the compensation for losses from remote routes, and imposes pressure on employees opposing the company by using it as the cost of selecting large pumps,” and the Defendant stated the false facts as it was justifiable that C did not have employed a large pumps with the subsidies of Jeollabuk-do, and that C’s dismissal against D and E was legitimate.

However, C is being operated every year with financial support, subsidy for remote routes, etc., and is unfair.