logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.09.20 2017고단2091
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, who was the chairperson of B from around 2006 to around 2013, was a person who prepared the minutes upon the completion of a meeting with the implied consent of the members of the clan when there is an extended meeting of executive officers or a clan general meeting, and the above public members of B are divided into the E public strike in which the defendant belongs C and D, etc.

1. On October 10, 2012, the Defendant altered a private document, according to a plan to be admitted from the office of the Pyeongtaek-si branch of Pyeongtaek-si F building G G G, which had been a cemetery of Pyeongtaek-si, around November 2007, in accordance with the I development project, around September 21, 2012, the Defendant would have received approximately KRW 8.6 billion compensation from the I Co., Ltd. to move the cemetery, and would have to bear the expenses for moving the cemetery to the D Co., Ltd., which had been a cemetery of Pyeongtaek-si, which had been a cemetery of Pyeongtaek-si. In response to the plan to be admitted from the office of the D Co., Ltd., Ltd. on July 24, 2007, the Defendant changed the minutes to the resolution of the resolution on the transfer of the cemetery to the D Co., Ltd.

After removing the original minutes prepared by the Defendant as of July 24, 2007, the Defendant removed the minutes from the original minutes, and had K, which caused the administrative affairs of the clan, prepare a new expanded meeting minutes of the clan, stating that “I will bear the expenses for the stone works of the tomb Lareon-si Lareon-si Lareon-si Lareon-si shall be borne by B by the clan clan.”

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant changed the minutes of the B public clan expansion executive meeting, which is a document concerning the proof of facts in the name of 30 persons, including D, who attended the above meeting.

2. Exercising any forged document;

A. On October 10, 2012, the Defendant: (a) kept an extended meeting minutes of the executive members meeting with the foregoing paragraph (1) at the office of the clan G G of Pyeongtaek-si building G; and (b) held the same.

B. On February 6, 2013, the Defendant issued a copy of the expanded meeting minutes from Pyeongtaek-si M to N in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government with the content certification form.

arrow