Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The Defendant did not have any misunderstanding of facts that: (a) around April 2018, the Defendant: (b) dialogueed with D in front of the restaurant located in F at the end of the end of the official city; or (c) told D to the effect that “I would have to get less punishment, different from what he had to have, cut down only juries”; and (d) caused D to testify differently from the facts.
B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. 1) In light of the relevant legal principles and the principle of court-oriented trials, etc., comprehensively considering the results of the examination of evidence conducted in the first instance and the results of additional examination of evidence conducted until the closing of argument in the appellate court, the appellate court shall not without permission reverse the first instance judgment on the credibility of the statement made by the witness in the first instance unless there are exceptional cases deemed significantly unfair to maintain the first instance judgment on the credibility of the statement made by the witness in the first instance (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Do14409, Feb. 25, 2010). In addition, where the witness’s statement is consistent in the main part, solely on the grounds that the statement made by the witness is somewhat inconsistent, it does not unreasonably deny the credibility of the statement made in the first instance court (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Do10728, Mar. 14, 2008).
In light of the above legal principles, a thorough comparison of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below, D's statements in the investigation agency and the court below, which correspond to the facts charged in this case, are mutually consistent and specific in major parts, and are reasonable in accordance with other evidences and the explanation of situation is reasonable.