1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, and those resulting from the participation in the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is that the court’s acceptance of the judgment of the first instance is insufficient to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s assertion, and the fact-finding results of this court’s E-Unions are rejected, and this case’s acceptance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for dismissal or addition of some contents as follows. Thus, it is without merit by the main text

Under the second page of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "59 square meters" in the third place (hereinafter referred to as "the development recompense area of this case") shall be deemed as "59 square meters (hereinafter referred to as "the development recompense area of this case") and two lots other than 559 square meters."

The third letter of the judgment of the first instance court is " July 2, 2012, the same seal" as " July 10, 2012."

The 4th 10th 10th 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 2th

"A evidence No. 36" shall be added to the ground for recognition of the fourth 17th sentence of the first instance court.

Part 8 of the decision of the first instance court " December 18, 2014" shall be read as " December 23, 2014".

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and all appeals against the Defendants by the Plaintiff are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.