(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.03.09 2015고단4390

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.03.09 2015고단4390

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 11, 2008, at the public notice center office operated by the defendant, who is located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, the defendant, on March 11, 2008, published an advertisement to employ one music teacher each at the Suwon High School and Suwon High School.

A false statement was made that the head of the Gyeonggi-do Office of Education, the head of the Suwon High School, the head of the Suwon High School E, and the F members who are local members of the F Council will be employed as music education teachers without a framework, trusting that he would be employed as music education teachers without a framework.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any specific friendship with the head of the Gyeonggi-do Office of Education, the head of the Suwon High School E, the F member of the local Assembly, and there was no intention or ability to employ the victim's father as a music education teacher.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is 60 million won or more on the same day from the victim; and

4. 10. Around October, 196, a sum of KRW 90,000,000,000 was obtained and acquired through deception.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each part of the statement made by the witness D and G in the third public trial records;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. Certificates and notes of borrowing;

1. In light of the following facts, the copy of the NongHyup passbook, the director of the receipt (one month), the details of transactions on the check in his front, and the certificates of transaction account [the defendant merely borrowed money from the injured party, but the injured party's father and the injured party's wife consistently make statements from the investigative agency up to the court, ② the injured party's relationship with the defendant and the injured party, and the economic situation of the injured party, etc., are consistent with the facts charged. ③ The injured party's situation, etc. is consistent with the facts charged; ④ the defendant's defense is not consistent and there is no objective evidence to prove the contents thereof.

유사 판례

-청주지방법원 제천지원 2016.06.10 2016고합12

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.21 2016노261

-수원지방법원 2016.06.10 2016고합187

-인천지방법원 2018.05.11 2017노4034

-수원지방법원 2016.05.24 2015고합503