logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.12.23 2016고단1899
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From May 2014, the Defendant is a person who had worked as the head of the D Co., Ltd. operated by the victim C from around May 201.

1. Fraud;

A. Around August 18, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “Around August 18, 2014, at the office of the D Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., located in Kimhae-si, “I will, if I would lend money to I and I would return money to I, I would have received KRW 4 million from

However, the defendant did not have any particular property at the time, and was equivalent to or more than 63 million won of debt including financial rights, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to repay it.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 4 million won from the victim for the purpose of borrowing money.

B. Around August 25, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would pay KRW 7 million if he/she lends his/her parents deposit to the victim at the D Office, Inc., Ltd. as stated in paragraph 1(a).”

However, the defendant did not have any particular property at the time, and the debt including financial rights was equivalent to 63 million won, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to repay the money to the F who was the previous defrauded.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 7 million won from the victim for the purpose of borrowing money.

C. Around March 2, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “When investing in the AD Investment Project, the Defendant would return the proceeds from the investment of the principal to the victim twice the principal. If a certain amount of KRW 100 million is lent to the said project, the Defendant would pay twice the principal by investing in the said project.”

However, in fact, there was no entity, and even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, it is living expenses.

arrow