logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.12.09 2016고단834
사기
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around May 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A victim D, a successor to the same military unit, who belongs to the Chungcheong-gun B, “A de facto E, in a de facto marital relationship, intends to open a knife house in Hongcheon, and borrowed money. The Defendant bears the interest, and the principal will be returned immediately upon request by NA.”

However, the defendant's income at the time was insufficient to pay the principal and interest of the loan, living expenses, etc., and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have an intention or ability to pay it.

Around May 24, 2011, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 8 million from the victim, via an account in the name of the Defendant (Account Number:F).

2. Around July 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim at the same place to the effect that “E would pay 8 million won including the money and interest that it borrowed prior to the cafeteria, if it loans 8 million won as funds are insufficient to operate a restaurant in the Hong National Highway.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 8 million from the victim to the said account on July 10, 2012.

3. On December 2013, at the same place, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “E intends to open a limited restaurant at capital level, and if the funds are insufficient to lend KRW 24 million to the victim, he/she will repay all including the money previously lent.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 24 million from the victim’s account (Account Number: G) on December 24, 2013.

(i) the evidence;

arrow