A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 19:10 on January 13, 2019, the Defendant committed assault, such as the defect in the number plate as the Defendant’s vehicle was confirmed as a vehicle subject to provisional custody and its number plate was removed, the left hand hand of the light-line E on one occasion due to the left hand, and the chest part of the chest part was pushed down several times.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers and the execution of provisional custody procedures for vehicles to be kept in custody.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Each statement of F, G and H;

1. Other closure photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to hear statements by police officers visiting the police station);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the degree of interference with the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is not somewhat weak, the punishment as ordered shall be determined in light of the following: (a) there is no record of interference with the performance of official duties; and (b) there is no record of violent crimes after 199; and (c) recognition of and reflects late or late mistakes.