logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.01.16 2019노6210
공문서위조등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Recognizing that circumstances are recognized, such as the fact that the Defendant led to the confession of the instant crime and reflects the Defendant’s mistake in depth, that there are children to rear the Defendant, and that there is no other criminal record, other than once a fine due to the instant crime, the Defendant seems to have been already considered in the sentencing of the lower court.

In addition, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant involved in the act of collecting cash in the organization of Bosing criminal, and forged the official document under the name of the Chairperson of the Financial Services Commission, and obtained cash by using forged documents upon approaching the victims. In light of the applicable law and contents of the crime, the crime was committed very poor; four victims are victims; the total amount of damages reaches KRW 120 million; the crime of Bosing is very heavy; the crime of Bosing is committed in a very strict and planned manner; it is difficult to regulate the scope of damage as it is difficult to prevent the crime, and it is not easy to recover the damage, and it is highly harmful to the society. Accordingly, it is necessary to strictly punish the crime of this case. The damage suffered by the victims was not recovered, and the punishment of the same and similar cases was not recovered, and the punishment of the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, motive and consequence of the crime of this case, and the punishment of this case is not recognized in light of various circumstances after the oral proceedings of this case.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is not accepted.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow