logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.04.11 2015누72902
공무상요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following parts to be filled or added. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Under the third page of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term "this court" shall be deemed to be "the court of first instance and this court", the term "the results of fact inquiry" to be "the results of fact inquiry" to be "each fact inquiry results", and the term "this court" to be "the court of first instance" to be "the court of first instance" respectively.

Then, the fourth part of the judgment of the court of first instance added "(the same shall apply even if the statement 15-1 and 2 of the evidence No. 15 and the result of the request for examination of the medical record on the president of the Korean Medical Association for the purpose of this Court)" to "no. 7" (the result of the testimony of the witness D and the fact inquiry on B of this Court is insufficient to recognize that the plaintiff had served overtime during the above period)."

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow