logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.12.20 2017고단5949
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"The 2017 Highest 5949" B operated a "M", which is a commercial entertainment business establishment located on the seventh floor of the Goi-gu L Building from January 2016 to Gosi-si. From February 2016, Defendant A was an employee of the said commercial entertainment business establishment, who was called a pre-contract telephone in accordance with B's instructions, or who was found in the said commercial entertainment business establishment from February 2016, and gave guidance to a room where a commercial sex woman is located.

1. Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts) (hereinafter “M”), in collusion with Defendant A, from February 2, 2016 to August 18, 2016, Defendant A arranged commercial sex acts by providing guidance as a room where an unspecified male who found the above business establishment has a female of the Thailand’s nationality to receive sexual intercourse in return for payment of sexual sex acts from the unspecified male who had found the above business establishment, and by paying the red sea, etc.

2. On August 20, 2016, after the said sexual traffic business establishment was controlled by the police, Defendant A also prepared a false lease agreement stating the lessor F and the Defendant as the lessee of the said business establishment at around August 20, 2016, and prepared and submitted a written statement of the fact that the said business establishment was unemployed on November 18, 2016, which included the daily wage from the said “M” as KRW 100,000,000,000 as the above gold. As the Defendant was the unemployment owner of the said sexual traffic business establishment, Defendant A prepared a false contract for the lease of the said business establishment as if the said business establishment was unemployed and the Defendant was asked to make a false statement to the police. On the following day, Defendant A also prepared a false lease agreement between the lessor F and the Defendant as the lessee of the said business establishment. On November 18, 2016, Defendant was present at the said police station and stated the said business establishment as the unemployment owner of the said business establishment.

As a result, Defendant A knew that he committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

"2017 Highest 6081"

1. Defendant B and A’s joint crimes are unemployed owners who run “M”, a commercial entertainment business establishment located on the seventh floor of the train-gu Lbuilding from around February 2015, and A from February 2016.

arrow