1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 38,835,700 to Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 7,723,750 to Plaintiff B; (c) KRW 7,579,350 to Plaintiff C; and (d) KRW 3,540,00 to Plaintiff D3.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business Recognition and Public Notice - Business Name: E transfer center development project (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”): Public Notice F, etc. of Chungcheongbuk-do on August 3, 2012 - Business Operator: Defendant

(b) The adjudication of expropriation made on August 20, 2013 by the Chungcheongbuk-do Regional Land Tribunal - The objects to be expropriated and the compensation shall be as follows:

(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant lands”). Compensation for land category (hereinafter referred to as “land to be expropriated”). G2,426 G 982,530,000, 163,602,00 H 438 M 3,682,00 M 3,680, 224,100 BJ 97, 21,970,500 BJ 21,970,504,958,500 K 828,1828,988,000 C 1,003, 199,643,000,4646, 400, 600, 608, 16, 208, 2016, 16, 16, 2008, 16, 16, 200, 16, 2008

(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on June 19, 2014 - Contents of the ruling: To be indicated in Table 2 below:

G2,426 G 1,163,602,00 1,174,90,800 H 438,800 H 438,224,100 225,383,500 1,283,50,283,50 B J 9720 B J 9720,958,5050 205,951,250 92,750 K 828 C 1,103,246,459,000 1,641,650,641,650, 6528, 206, 206, 206, 206, 306, 206, 206, 306, 405, 206, 206, 306, 206, 206, 2061.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' alleged acceptance ruling and the compensation amount for losses under this ruling were assessed excessively because they mistakenly selected the comparative standard or failed to properly meet the standards for goods, so the defendant should pay the difference between the compensation amount reasonably determined according to the court appraiser's appraisal and the compensation amount determined in the appraisal.

(b).