Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. 공용 물건 손상 피고인은 2018. 2. 5. 03:43 경 서울 마포구 마포대로 183에 있는 마포 경찰서 1 층 C과 사무실에서 D에 대한 폭행으로 현행범인 체포되어 와 대기하고 있던 중 갑자기 조사 중이 던 경찰관 자리로 다가와 “ 이런 씨 발 새끼들이, 야 이 좀 만한 새끼들이 ”라고 욕설하며 발로 경찰관 책상 보조 서랍 장을 걷어 차 서랍 장 상단 문짝 부분을 부숴 공무소에서 사용하는 물건을 손상시켰다.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the time, time, and place described in paragraph 1, as described in paragraph 1, opened a boarding room located in C and the office after walking a police officer’s guide, she saw him/her to take care of him/her, and her face two times by drinking, and assaulting him/her to walk his/her breast part at one time, thereby hindering the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the duty of a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (investigation of photographs damaged by goods for public use);

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (a) (a point of damage to goods for public use), Article 136(1) (a) of the Criminal Act (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Unfavorable circumstances: The fact that a person who interferes with the performance of public duties needs to be punished strictly for the purpose of protecting public authority and establishing legal order;

1. A favorable condition: The defendant has no record of criminal punishment in addition to punishment by a fine imposed once for a crime of violating the Traffic Act on the road, the defendant deposited 1.5 million won for the victim police officers, the confession of the crime, and reflects the defendant's age, sex, intelligence and environment, relationship with the victim, and the crime;