logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.10 2018고정1588
공전자기록등불실기재등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, who became aware of a loan from the Internet, will make a legal entity due to the fact that he or she has become aware of the loan, and deliver the consideration if it exceeds the access media such as passbook in the name of the legal entity, Internet banking, etc.

“In response to the proposal to the purport, on September 13, 2016, after the receipt of a proposal, the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Office’s certificate of seal impression, resident registration certificate, copy of identification card, and power of attorney, etc. necessary for the establishment of a corporation in the vicinity of the Sandong Sandong, Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, shall be issued to the person in charge of the name, and on October 13, 2016, the person in charge of the name in charge shall prepare documents necessary for the registration of establishment, such as the application for the registration of establishment of a corporation, which is described as “mutually Co., Ltd. B, the head office, Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building 201, 1,000,000, and 1,000,000 won, and submitted it to the public official in charge of the said day to enter the above fact in the electronic information system of registration of a corporation, which is an electronic records, and then, stored and operated a corporate computer system that has been entered therein.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with a person who has no name, made a false report to a public official, made a false report to record false facts in the same electronic record as the original copy of a fair deed, and exercised the same electronic record by storing and operating the same electronic record as the corporate register on which the false facts are recorded.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant’s legal statement

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the entire certificate of registration;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 228(1), 30 (the re-issuance of an electronic record, such as the official record, etc., selection of fines), 229, 228(1), and 30 (the occupation of an event, such as an electronic record entered as false, and the selection of fines) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

arrow