Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[2013 Highly 274] On August 9, 2010, the Defendant expressed that the victim and his family members were flickly out of the house of the victim C (manam and 39 years of age) located in Masung-gun, Masung-gun, Masung-gun, and expressed that the victim and his family members were flickly out, and that one of the victim's family members was "hickly hicker" and "hicking about 30 cm in length (18 cm in length) in his house kitchen, and threatened the victim with the victim's body, as the victim's body would be harmed.

[2013 fixed275] No person shall intermediate another person's communications or provide it for another person's communications, using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator.

Nevertheless, around January 18, 2010, the Defendant opened one cell phone (KT and E) in front of the Jeju Northern-gu D agency, and around that time, transferred 100,000 won and one cell phone from the above date and time from the above point of time to the person who was absent from his name.

2. By August 2, 200, seven mobile phones were opened over seven times, such as the list of crimes in the annexed list, and the above mobile phone was transferred around that time.

Accordingly, the defendant provided telecommunications services provided by KT and SK for another's telecommunications service.

Summary of Evidence

[2013 High Court Decision 274]

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A photograph of the criminal tool (2013 high-level275);

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each application for joining each mobile phone (Evidence Nos. 24 through 30);

1. Relevant statutory provisions for criminal facts, Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act for the choice of punishment, and Articles 72 Subparag. 7 and 32-2 of the former Telecommunications Business Act (amended by Act No. 10166, Mar. 22, 2010); and the selection of punishment penalty for each violation of Article 32-2 of the former Telecommunications Business Act

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act.