logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.05.03 2018고단623
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, Defendant B, and C, respectively, by a fine of KRW 3 million.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 30, 2017, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a violation of the Act on the Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes (Unlawful Medical Business Operators) at the Daejeon District Court on November 30, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 8, 2017.

Defendant

B On January 26, 2018, the Daejeon District Court sentenced two years of suspension of execution to six months of imprisonment for perjury, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 3, 2018.

Criminal facts

The Defendants, along with E, displayed the victim through the Internet hosting, carried the victim with drinking alcohol, and sentenced the victim to receive agreements from the victim or the insurance company by intentionally carrying the vehicle accident.

1. Violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint conflict), Defendant C, and B who damaged special property to the victim F, on March 31, 2016, by using a hosting pattern, “G,” the victim F, while drinking alcohol together with drinking the victim F, and the victim “W, Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Ha and Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Hads

Defendant

A and E, while driving I SM5 vehicle and waiting in the middle of Daejeon Metropolitan City, finds that JM6 vehicle driven by JM6 vehicle driven by the victim F is driving on the one-way road, and intentionally shocked the side of the above SM5 vehicle, which is an object dangerous to the rear side of the above SM6 vehicle, causing a traffic accident, damage the back part of the above SM6 vehicle owned by the victim to be 347,66 won for repair, and continue to drive the victim “dacted;”

How is????

“Along with the fact that the police did not reach an agreement, it did not receive money from a person who was frighted by threatening the victim as if he reported to the police, but did not receive money from a person who was frighted to drinking, but did not commit an attempted crime.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with E, and thereby, dangerous objects.

arrow