logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.07.10 2014고합69
수뢰후부정처사등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years and by a fine of twenty thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[The Defendant’s status and relation with D] The Defendant deleted his career records. From around 2000, the Defendant knew with D, a narcotics offender and a narcotics case hub D, and obtained information from D to obtain the control records on narcotics crimes, and on the other hand, maintained the relationship, such as inmacy or convenience in the case requested by D.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around October 8, 2008, the Defendant of violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act introduced I, who is a staff member of the H attorney-at-law office, to the effect that “The head of the office office of the H attorney-at-law is fluent and that H attorney-at-law is a fluent attorney inasmuch as H attorney-at-law has a influence on F support, it may be sentenced to a stay of execution judgment,” while introducing I, who is an staff member of the H attorney-at-law office, to the F branch office No. 2008, No. 41748, the Defendant under investigation.

Since then, the above G was appointed as the above H lawyer in the amount of KRW 20 million through D, and the Defendant received KRW 10 million in cash from the above I in return for the introduction of the parties at the H attorney-at-law office located in the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan GovernmentJ around that time.

As a result, the defendant introduced the party to a case under investigation to a specific attorney-at-law so that the attorney-at-law can accept the case and accepted money in return for the introduction.

2. An illegal agency after accepting the accepted bribery concerning the K case;

A. On September 21, 2008, K was detained as a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the L Police Station. The detention case was sent to the F Branch Office of the E prosecutor’s office on September 26, 2008, which was sent to the F Branch Office of the E prosecutor’s office, No. 2008 type No. 40762, and was distributed to the F Branch Office of the E prosecutor’s office under the direction of the M prosecutor, and the Defendant was in charge of the investigation.

When the detention case was sent to F branch office, the prosecution was suspended at K's Busan East District Prosecutors' Office.

arrow