Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, with respect to Defendant A, it shall be for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 23, 2014, at around 00:10, the Defendants reported on the road in front of Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon Western Police Station, that the slope F, G, and slope H will control the joint driving of drinking, and that Defendant A would maintain and depart from the road to avoid this, the above police officers notified Defendant A of the fact that the above police officers informed Defendant A was in charge of the crackdown on drinking driving, and caused Defendant A to suffer from drinking so that they could not take drinking while drinking, and requested Defendant A to take a drinking test using a respiratory device, and Defendant A did so so so, the Defendant “I would not have driven a drinking, she would have to take a breath, she would not have driven a drinking, she would not take a breath, she would not take a breath, she would not take a breath, she would have a breath, she would not take a breath, she would not take a breath, she would be his superior.”

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the crackdown on drinking driving.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement, Defendant B’s partial legal statement

1. Each legal statement of the witness F, G and J;

1. Application of each prosecutor's interrogation protocol to the Defendants

1. Articles 136 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Determination on the assertion of Defendant B and defense counsel under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant B and.