logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.01.21 2012구단14050
최초요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 4, 2010, while becoming a member of the Han Young-gu Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted company”) and being in charge of alcoholic beverage delivery business, the Plaintiff came to be an alcoholic beverage 148 even in a logistics warehouse on September 23, 201, and thereafter, the pain began from the following day. As a result of the examination, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “after-standing Manekne-on on the left side of the bar (hereinafter “instant wound”), and applied for medical care benefits to the Defendant on January 9, 2012.

B. On February 17, 2012, the Defendant rejected the Plaintiff’s application for medical care on the ground that “The Plaintiff’s duty of alcoholic beverage delivery is not verified to the extent of being borne by kneeee, and it is not confirmed as to the applicant’s injury and disease on the left side of knee in the half-month knee, and then on the part of half-month knee in the video opinion.” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Judgment of the court below] The plaintiff 1 and the plaintiff 1

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the Plaintiff did not receive knee therapy for six (6) years before entering the Nonparty Company. While working in the Nonparty Company for one (1) year and six (6) months, the Plaintiff, in particular, handled heavy things in the future while carrying goods on the cargo vehicle from the attendance to the leaving of office, and in the customer warehouse, she gets off or left away from the cargo vehicle.

Since the injury and disease of this case is caused by the above duties, the defendant's disposition is unlawful.

B. In full view of the aforementioned evidence, the following facts and medical opinions can be acknowledged in light of the aforementioned evidence: (a) Gap evidence Nos. 2 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 5; and (b) the overall purport of the argument in the medical record appraisal process for the head of Korea University Hospital; and (a) the Plaintiff engaged in any work, such as ice-to-sing, singing-to-sing, cleaning, and the support for a sealed factory, before entering the non-party company.

The plaintiff works for the non-party company from March 4, 2010 to December 31, 201, and serves for liquor and fluorization.

arrow