1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2.However, the execution of the above imprisonment for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 29, 2014, around 02:30 on March 29, 2014, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties, such as the maintenance of public order and security of G, by opening the racker door of the patrol car and making the face of G several times as drinking without any particular reason, in order to enable the Defendant to return home under the influence of alcohol, in the front and front of the building E in the building E or the street of the party branch of the Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, by receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant assaults another person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. The police statement concerning G;

3. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

3. Part of rejection of prosecution under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) of the community service order;

1. Around 02:00 on March 29, 2014, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol at a place indicated in the facts constituting a crime as indicated in the judgment of the lower court, assaulted the victim H’s flag, which took a warning on a cell phone without any justifiable reason, flaging the victim’s face on two occasions with left hand, and assaulted the victim’s chest on one occasion with knene.

2. Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act and Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant.