The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s punishment (one million won in penalty) against the Defendant on the summary of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. Although the Defendant acknowledges all of the instant crimes, and there are no circumstances to consider the circumstances, such as the Defendant’s absence of criminal investigation experience, the lower court appears to have rendered a sentence by fully considering such circumstances, and it is reasonable to respect the sentencing of the lower court in the instant case where there is no change in circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the lower judgment was rendered.

In addition, even if examining all the sentencing conditions specified in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the form of the act of aggressioning the central line of this case, the age, economic situation, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal of this case is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.