1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following modification of certain matters. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

According to the evidence evidence Nos. 34, 35, 38, and 1 and 27 of the first instance court’s judgment, “only these evidence” was examined, and “H was indicted on September 9, 2016 in Seoul Central District Court Decision 2014Gohap674, 965 (Merger), but was acquitted on July 20, 2018 (Seoul High Court Decision 2016No3010). However, the prosecutor appealed and was sentenced to the judgment of conviction (three years of imprisonment) from the appellate court (Seoul High Court Decision 2016No3010) and thereafter, the fact that the appellate court currently (Supreme Court Decision 2018Do12831) is pending in the final appeal (including the evidence Nos. 3333, 36, 379 through 431). However, the evidence No. 1 of the first instance court’s judgment was included in the evidence Nos. 3 through 36, 379 through 431).

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.