logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.02.05 2015고단389 (1)
위증
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On November 27, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in one year and six months by imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapon, etc.) at the Jung-gu District Court, and the judgment on December 5, 2015 became final and conclusive.

【Criminal facts against the Defendant appeared as witness in the case of violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapon, etc.) against 2280 Gobu District Court No. 5, 2014 order 2014 order 2014 order 2280 C at around October 28, 2014.

Defendant 3’s defense counsel’s “I am informed of Defendant C at the time, and I am her from the father of Defendant C.

I cannot see the question "......."

“At the time of the instant case, the witness of the public prosecutor’s continuing to give testimony to the witness is entirely required to have incurred in the loss of the principal soldier at that time.”

The witness bears the testimony of “....” and the prosecutor’s witness continues to write the Defendant C due to his own illness.

The prosecutor's answer to the question "...." and the prosecutor's answer to the defendant C, however, is why the defendant C was suffering.

The question, “The two softens per week clame on the floor,” and they are flicked to the floor.

“The answer was made.”

However, in fact, on April 12, 2014, the Defendant was at the time of the head of a shouldered Soviet Disease while drinking alcohol together with C in the E-pentaeburgic Chapter C’s “Egymburging” of the operation of the Gyeonggi-si Group D, Gyeonggi-do, 2014.

Ultimately, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Copies of the protocol of examination of the witness to the accused in the second trial of the case No. 2280 High Court Order 2014;

1. Copies of each protocol concerning the examination of suspects of the accused and C by the prosecution;

1. A copy of the investigation report and a photograph of evidence;

1. Previous conviction: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of inquiry about criminal history;

1. Relevant Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 37 of the Criminal Code for the Treatment of Concurrent Crimes

arrow