The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (eight months of imprisonment) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

Judgment

It is recognized that the defendant committed a crime by contingency.

However, the defendant is subject to criminal punishment more than 20 times, such as punishment 11 times for violent crimes, and the two weeks after being released from prison as a general structure or a fire prevention crime, which is a kind of violent crimes, is also not good for such crimes as assault crimes, crime of fraud and interference with business after six weeks, and crime of repeated crimes.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the following factors, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., and the scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines (one month to one month from two months) and the scope of the sentencing guidelines, the sentence of the lower court is too unfair.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to appeal.