The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for six months and two years of suspended execution) that the court below sentenced against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime, and that the Defendant had no record of being punished for the same kind of crime, and that there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine even for the same type of crime, etc. are favorable to the Defendant.

However, in light of the business period of the key bank of this case operated by the defendant (a half year and three months virtual volume), the number of employees employed, and the scale of business, etc., the defendant seems to have earned considerable profits from the crime of this case. The crime of this case is that the defendant let female employees do obscene acts with customers. In light of the content and degree of obscene acts, there is no specific difference from the act of similarity, and it is a crime that has great social harm and harm to the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and thus, there is a need to strictly punish them. Considering the balance with the sentencing of other defendants punished in the same case, other circumstances as the defendant's age, character and environment, occupation, power, circumstances, means and result, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.