logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.08.20 2013구합3291
손실보상금
Text

1. The defendant 108,951 won, plaintiff B, C, D, E, F, G, and H respectively, 72,634 won, plaintiff I, J, K, L, and M respectively.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. In the land research division drafted during the Japanese occupation point period, the land research division consisting of those residing in Q on March 16, 1912, and those living in Female-gun on April 19, 1912, and those living in Female-gun T on April 19, 1912, respectively.

B. On May 16, 198, the land Nos. 1 and 2 of the annexed table Nos. 1 and 2 (hereinafter “instant No. 1 and 2”) was divided into “river”; on May 16, 198, the land category was changed to “river”; on May 16, 198, the land No. 3 of the annexed table Nos. 3 of the annexed table of land (hereinafter “the land No. 3”) was converted to “river”; and on January 13, 1958, the land category was changed to “river”; and on January 13, 1958.

C. On May 27, 1996, Korea completed registration of initial ownership relating to the land Nos. 1, 2, and 3 of this case (hereinafter “each land of this case”). D.

Each of the instant lands is within the river section of the Han River designated as national river by the "the name of the river under Article 2 of the River Act and the case of the designation of a section" enacted by the Decree No. 1255 of April 1, 1963, and the time of actual incorporation of each of the instant lands into the Han River basin. However, the construction division stated that the instant land was incorporated into the Han River basin as the Han River basin in the default on the payment of the river basic plan for Han River which was prepared in 192, and the construction division stated that the instant land was incorporated into the Han River basin river basin as the Han River basin.

E. Since the plaintiffs died on February 19, 1931, the plaintiffs finally jointly succeeded to the properties of R as of the date of the closing of the argument of this case, and the specific inheritance shares are as stated in the list of the inheritance share ratio and the amount of recognition.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 3-1, 2, 4-1 through 15, 5, 1 through 6-1, 7-1 through 6, respectively, and this Court.

arrow