1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On September 21, 1911, the Land Survey Division drafted during the Japanese Occupation Period, stating that R, having the address column as of September 21, 191, was under the assessment of Gyeonggi-gun, Gwangju-gun, 592 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. According to the Han River Register of the Han River Maintenance Master Plan drawn up by the Construction Ministry on December 12, 1978, the instant land is included in the Han River basin which is a national river, and the current Han River site is the river area and the inside part of the river site is the desolate River site.

C. Since then, the instant land was 2,744 square meters of the Gyeonggi-do Tro-gun, Gwangju-gun, through the conversion of the area, etc., and the registration of ownership preservation was completed in the future of Korea on June 14, 1984, and the said land was 2,744 square meters of the Republic of Korea on September 27, 2001 due to the change of the name of the administrative district.

The inheritance relationship of the plaintiffs is as follows.

1) On June 10, 1964, R R, the permanent domicile of which was located in Gyeonggi-gun V, died and succeeded to AB, AB, AC, AD, AE, AE, and Q Q, which are children of W, X,Y, Z and south AA (Death of August 10, 1959). 2) AB died on November 13, 1992, and succeeded to the Plaintiff B, C, D, D, E, F, and G, which are their children.

3) AC deceased on July 13, 1992 and succeeded to Plaintiff H, I, J, K, and L, their children. 4) AE died on July 10, 1982 and succeeded to Plaintiff N,O, and P, their wife, who were Plaintiff M and their children.

[Reasons for Recognition] The non-contentious facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and 6, the fact inquiry results to the head of the Seoul Regional Construction and Management Administration and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion is that R and R are the same person, and since the land in this case was incorporated into a river area, the defendant is obligated to pay compensation for losses to the plaintiffs, who are the heir of R, in accordance with the Act on Special Measures for the Compensation, etc. for Land Incorporated into the River (hereinafter "River Compensation Act").

3...