Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On November 19, 2018, the Defendant driven a B Radon car on November 19, 2018, which led to three-lanes in the direction of the captain in the direction of the captain of the Dong-gun, Busan metropolitan area, the Busan metropolitan area, and the port near the Busan metropolitan area, in the direction of the captain.

During that period, the defendant threatened the victim C(50 years of age) who was driving in the two-lanes of the front line with the direction of the DPoter cargo vehicle and the change of the lanes to the three-lanes without using the direction, etc., and thereby, the defendant threatened the victim C(50 years of age) with the speed by driving approximately approximately 2.5 km away from the Maritime Department and the Maritime Department & the Maritime Department to the front road of the East Busan Department.

After all, the defendant, while being aware of the fact that an accident with the latter vehicle might occur in the event of a sudden transit on the expressway at night, operated the above passenger vehicle in front of the above cargo vehicle in front of the above cargo vehicle in which the above cargo vehicle was traveling along the same lane at night, and eventually, the F tourist bus operated by E while driving the same lane at the rear side of the above cargo vehicle in the above cargo vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant, using the above rash car, which is a dangerous object, inflicted injury on the victim G (hereinafter 45 years old) who was accompanied by the above rash, which requires approximately 3 weeks of medical treatment for the victim C, such as a rash of a rash, a rash of a rash and a rash of a rash of a rash for about 6 months, and at the same time, damaged the 15,43,878 won of the cost of repairing the Poter truck owned by the victim C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. The defendant and the defense counsel have been forcedly operated to prevent accidents because the damaged vehicle has not been secured due to continuously manipulating the height of the damaged vehicle. Thus, there was no dolusent intention about the injury and damage of property.