Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 24, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main business by avoiding disturbance for about 40 minutes, such as drinking alcohol at the “D” operated by the victim C, which was operated by the victim C, and drinking alcohol at the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the above time, place, and 112 reported and sent to the site, discovered and prevented the Defendant from wearing the boomed on a third party’s tables inside the business site, and committed assault by the police officer, i.e., e., f., e., bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to 112 reporting management.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. A victim statement prepared in C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the photographed person;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties) and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Since the reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the sentencing guidelines do not apply to the recruitment of the workhouses.

An assaulting a police officer to perform official duties and the nature of the crime is not good, the defendant is against the confession of the crime of this case, the degree of interference with the performance of official duties is not much important, the defendant agreed with the victim of the crime interfering with official duties. The defendant deposited money with a police officer who was the victim of the crime interfering with official duties, deposited money with a police officer who was the victim of the crime, there was no record of punishment for the same crime, and contingently under the influence of alcohol.