A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. On April 11, 2018, at around 17:30, the Defendant interfering with his/her duties is drunk on the second floor of the C Service Center located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on April 11, 2018, and D, an employee of the said Service Center, has a large number of customers on the ground that he/she does not properly improve his/her smartphone, and the Defendant does not properly see the victim and his/her employees “Wek kw k kw e kw kw k kw kw k kk

I would like to repeat this wro wro wro wro wro wro wro wro, wrod by leaving his smartphones on the floor, and interfered with the victim's work for about 30 minutes by force.

2. On April 11, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at around 18:10, the Defendant: (a) reported at 112 at the above place (no. 7296); and (b) carried out a police box affiliated with the Seoul Gangseo Police Station of Gangseo-gu Seoul Police Station, the Defendant: “The Defendant’s fabk” identification of the c

It interfered with the legitimate performance of public duties of Gman who handles 112 reported cases by threatening the 112 police officers, such as intending to purchase the face part of G with the hand over two occasions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs interfering with affairs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order is that the defendant has a record of being punished several times for violent crimes, the degree of interference with duties is serious, and the police officer dispatched upon receiving a report of interference with duties will take a bath to the police officer, and commits a crime of obstructing the performance of official duties by assaulting him/her.

However, there is no previous criminal record exceeding the fine, there is no particular punishment history for the past five years, and the Handphone repair process will be made.