beta
Text
[Defendant A] Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year
[Defendant B, C] Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who was in office as the head of a school in charge of the management of students’ curriculum and the computerized records of the NES School’s living records (hereinafter “life records”) at L high schools located in Seongbuk-gu from March 1, 2013 to September 20, 2015, and Defendant B was in office as the principal of the above high school from August 16, 2005 to February 2017, and Defendant C was in office as the assistant principal of the above high school from September 1, 2012 to February 2017.
1. Defendant A
A. On March 2, 2013, the Defendant entered the same school as his/her child M on March 2, 2013, the Defendant, with the knowledge that he/she did not have the right to use the records, was unfairly granted the “right to use the records” under the pretext of comparison with the inspection by the Ministry of Education, with the knowledge that he/she did not have any “right to use the records.” The Defendant arbitrarily accessed the M’s daily records and arbitrarily changed the contents of the records as he/she had shown an outstanding ability and qualities in the large number of evaluation areas, or had the teacher in charge enter the records.
On February 28, 2014, the Defendant arbitrarily accessed the M’s daily records using a business computer located in the L High School Department, and then entered the “first-year creative experience activity” recorded by N, a guidance teacher for the first-year club in the year 2013, in addition to 19, the Defendant registered and processed the details entered in the school life records book as if he prepared N.
The Defendant, including that, from February 2, 2014 to February 2, 2015, entered 1,789 total sum of 14 areas by inserting false facts in addition to the contents written by the teacher in charge as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.
As a result, the Defendant has been granted the “right to use” unfairly for the purpose of causing another person to manage the records of the above school.