The judgment below

This part of the abandonment of duties is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that this judgment.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. According to the records, the defendant entered false facts into the electronic records of the electronic records, which is an official electronic records, and forged them, and the court below acquitted the defendant by misunderstanding facts, although it can be recognized that the defendant used them by keeping them on the electronic records, etc.

B. As to the abandonment of duty, the defendant was in charge of the defendant's work

In the year 2011 through 2014, the number of business handling cases is more than half compared to before and after the year 2011, and with respect to 189 cases where the defendant stated that he/she is not suspected of being suspected of the computer department of this case, the defendant was able to temporarily neglect his/her duties, such as in

Although the court below found the defendant not guilty on the part of the court below's misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles, the court below erred as above.

2. Determination

A. Determination on the part of the event, such as electronic records, and electronic records, such as electronic records, etc. 1) The crime of copying electronic records and electronic records, etc. prescribed in Articles 227-2 and 229 of the Criminal Act is premised on the premise that the electronic records are the electronic records of a public official or a public office. The electronic records of a public official or a public office refer to electronic records created directly or gratuitously by a public official or a public official. It includes the cases where a public official’s duty authority does not necessarily require legal grounds, and such electronic records are created as the authority of performing his/her duties by order, bylaws, etc.

However, in that the social credit rating or evidence ability of the contents of the electronic records is strong compared to the electronic records of the company, and the degree of damage caused by the electronic records is more severe than that of the company, the electronic records which are the object of the crime of writing, such as the electronic records, and the electronic records, such as the electronic records, shall meet the requirements or form of the electronic records.