logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2017.06.20 2017고단285
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person of "2017 Height 285" shall operate any motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance for motor vehicles.

On November 25, 2016, the Defendant owned a non-registered motor device bicycle, and caused D to drive the motor device bicycle on the road of the apartment complex complex for Acheon-si, Anncheon-si, Anncheon-si, Anncheon-si, by driving the motor device bicycle not covered by mandatory insurance at around 13:00.

"2017 Highest 428" defendant is the operator of the delivery agency, who is almost almost the holder of the engine of the Ethitice at the time of non-registration.

around 19:45 on December 9, 2016, the Defendant: (a) had E, an employee of the above delivery agency, operate the motor bicycle, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at approximately 300 meters away from the roads front of the oil station in the Chang-dong, Leecheon-si to the roads front of the same Sincheon-ro 1254.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 285]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D by the prosecution;

1. Mandatory insurance inquiry (F) (2017 high group 428);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A copy of the original payment notice;

1. Details of inquiries about screen pictures for the management of the mandatory insurance notice;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing motors, devices and bicycles at the detection site;

1. Relevant Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Compensation for Motor Vehicle Damages, and the choice of fines, respectively, concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects the crime, and the risk of recidivism is low by discontinuing delivery business, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered by comprehensively taking into account all kinds of sentencing conditions, including the defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and the criminal records of the defendant, etc.

arrow