logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.03.27 2017가단216501
임금 및 퇴직금
Text

1. The defendant,

A. 53,949,715 won to Plaintiff A and 6% per annum from October 16, 2016 to October 29, 2016, respectively.

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments written in Evidence A Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the Plaintiffs concluded an employment contract with the Defendant and agreed to pay the Plaintiff’s retirement pay of KRW 23,017,384 to the Plaintiff’s “D” from September 1, 2006 to April 17, 2014, and from July 28, 2014 to October 15, 2016, and Plaintiff B from September 17, 2007 to September 13, 2015, and the Defendant retired from office on October 30, 2017 (i.e., wages of KRW 27,031,730, KRW 31,917,985), and the Plaintiff’s payment of KRW 23,017,384 to the Plaintiff.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 53,949,715 (i.e., KRW 58,949,715 - KRW 5,000 where the Plaintiff was paid to the Plaintiff - KRW 5,000,000 on the date following the retirement of the Plaintiff ) and KRW 6% under the Commercial Act until October 29, 2016, which is from October 16 to 14, 2016; KRW 20% per annum as stipulated under the Labor Standards Act from the following day to the date of full payment; KRW 18,017,384 (= KRW 23,017,384) to the Plaintiff - The amount of KRW 5,00,000 where the Plaintiff was paid to the Plaintiff ? The damages for delay calculated at the rate from the next day to September 27, 2015, which is from September 14, 2015.

2. If so, the plaintiffs' claims of this case are justified, and all of them are accepted. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow