The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal only testified to the effect that “the physical disease at D was not in conformity with F’s face and fall into the floor of the D,” and that it was false after taking an oath as above, the court below erred by misapprehending the fact that the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, although it did not have testified falsely after taking an oath.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined in the judgment of the court below and the court below, the fact that D was the face of F at the time of the above injury, the co-defendant B, as well as the defendant, did not appeal despite having been convicted of perjury with the same content as the defendant, and that the judgment became final and conclusive, and that D, as the defendant of the above injury case, was convicted of the crime of bodily injury (700,000 won of fine) on the ground that D, who was the defendant of the above injury, was faced with F.

In full view of the above facts, it is sufficient to recognize that the defendant gave perjury as stated in the facts charged in this case, and the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.