The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal principles and erroneous determination of not guilty of the Defendant, even though it is acknowledged that the Defendant had the purpose and intention of evading compulsory execution at the time of transfer of the building with GJ 353 square meters and above ground (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

2. Determination

A. The judgment of the court below is based on the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below: (1) as of June 14, 2016, the principal and interest on the obligations stated in the facts charged of this case were KRW 150,570,000,000; (2) as of June 14, 2016, the sum of the principal and interest on the obligations owed by the defendant to D was KRW 148,370,000; (3) the sum of the credit card settlement payments used by the defendant, etc. claimed by D plus approximately KRW 30,770,000 ( KRW 15,5770,000 - KRW 14,8370,000; and (3) the defendant conspired with the above creditors to obtain the provisional attachment registration under the name of KRW 600,000,000,000 for the above claim for provisional attachment and KRW 208,000,000.