logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2014.05.26 2014고정88
모욕등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of criminal facts

A. At around 17:40 on April 3, 2013, the Defendant insultd the victim by openly insulting the victim by requesting the victim E (the victim E) to execute an unexclusive budget prior to this time in the Dsan Memorial located in Gyeonggi-gun C, and submitting the project plan, making it defective, and making the victim’s statement of the same project plan more than 2-3 times as “the victim’s statement of the project plan is written.”

B. The Defendant insultingd the victim E at the time, time, and place mentioned in Paragraph 1, as seen above, and assaulted the victim by making the victim’s chest part of the victim’s chest one time in good hands against the victim’s face.

2. Each of the facts charged in the instant case is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act, or cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, since a written agreement was submitted by the victim to the effect that the defendant withdraws his/her wish to file a complaint and punish the defendant on May 14, 2014, the prosecution of the instant case was dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 5 and 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow