1. All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be the principal lawsuit.

1. The reasons for this court’s acceptance of the judgment of the first instance are as follows: (a) changing “the date of February 27, 2016” to “the date of February 2016” in the third 17 and fourth 7th 7th 2016 of the judgment of the first instance; and (b) the following “the date of February 27, 2016” to “the date of December 27, 2016” is the same as the reasons for the judgment of the first instance, except for adding “the additional determination” to “the Defendant

2. Additional determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 2, 3, and Eul evidence Nos. 6 and the purport of the entire pleadings, the defendant can be recognized as having supplied the plaintiff with goods equivalent to KRW 55,352,00 (including value-added tax) as follows.

It is recognized that the Defendant received a total of KRW 59,584,00 from the Plaintiff from September 30, 2016 to April 3, 2017, total of KRW 4,232,00 (i.e., KRW 59,584,00) supply amount of KRW 50,000 on September 1, 2016, KRW 300,000, KRW 300, KRW 6050, KRW 605, KRW 600, KRW 605, KRW 205, KRW 2005, KRW 60, KRW 605, KRW 205, KRW 205, KRW 205, KRW 60, KRW 605, KRW 205, KRW 205, KRW 205, KRW 605, KRW 205, KRW 206, May 1, 2016).

B. On February 20, 2017 and June 10, 2017, the Defendant’s determination as to the assertion on supply as of February 20, 2017, shall be made on February 20, 2017.