A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On August 30, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year in the period of four months for criminal fraud in the residents support of the Daegu District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 7, 2016.

[Criminal facts] ... 2017 Highest 117

1. On September 2009, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would make efforts to establish a factory of the amount of 15 billion won to the victim C at the mutual infinite coffee shop located in Seoul, which is the head of the D Cooperatives, which is the head of the D Cooperatives, and which is in the amount of 15 billion won, and would make efforts to select the enterprise run by the Ne-gu as the contractor, and would make payment within three months if it is difficult to operate the business at present.”

However, in fact, the above Corporation had the authority to select the contractor in a consulting company selected by the above cooperative, and the defendant only has the authority to recommend the contractor, and it did not have any substantial influence on the selection of the contractor. The defendant is a bad credit holder, and the defendant has been liable for a large amount of debt since he had not been able to perform his obligations since he had not been able to perform his obligations since he had not been able to perform his obligations since he had not been able to perform his obligations since he had been able to perform his obligations due to the lack of financial standing. Therefore, even if he has received a new loan, he did not have any intent or ability to repay

On September 22, 2009, the Defendant received from the injured party the remittance of KRW 20 million from the account in the name of the Defendant E, a child of the Defendant, to the above false statement.

2. On December 2009, the Defendant called “If there is a cash liquidity problem temporarily lending money to the victim C at a non-permanent place, the Defendant would resolve the problem immediately and repay the money to all existing debts soon.”

However, due to the fact that the defendant was difficult to carry out economic circumstances for the same reasons as the statement in paragraph 1, the defendant shall pay money to the injured party even if he borrowed money.