A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Dok-in Vehicle) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accidented Measures) are those engaged in driving motor vehicles of Bhurd-tur

On January 9, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol of 0.094% with blood alcohol level 0.094% on January 18, 2015, and was driving at the speed of two lanes in front of D Licensed Real Estate Agents in Southern-gu C at the port of the port, using one lane from the front side of D Licensed Real Estate Agents in South-gu Seoul at the port to the unfluencing distance.

In this case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to properly manipulate the steering gear and prevent the accident by accurately manipulating the steering gear. The driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was negligent in driving without reducing the speed, received the part of the back part of the said rocketing taxi as the front part of the said Aburged vehicle. With the shocking of the said Aburged vehicle, the Defendant got off the said Aburged vehicle due to its shock, and received the front part of the said Aburged vehicle as the back part of the said Aburged vehicle. The part of the front part of the said Aburged vehicle by the victim G (W, 49 years old) driving that was stopped due to signal to the rear part of the said Aburged vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim E, such as salt, tensions, etc. requiring a medical treatment for about two weeks, and injury to the victim G, such as a multi-feasia, which requires a medical treatment for about one week, and at the same time, destroyed the 531,782 cost of repairing to the taxi owned by the victim E, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victims, even if it damages the 548,130 won of repairing cost to the taxi owned by the victim E, respectively.

2. The defendant violates the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the same time.