(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2019.01.29 2017가단112487

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2019.01.29 2017가단112487

손해배상(기)

Text

1. Defendant B’s KRW 91,620,70, and as to the Plaintiff, KRW 5% per annum from May 13, 2017 to January 29, 2019.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B: (a) operated with the 300 square meters of one story and 60 square meters of two-story factories in the steel frame panel and the 2nd floor in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si; (b) the 240 square meters of two-story factories (the building indicated as “E” in the attached Form drawings; hereinafter “instant operation”); (c) the building indicated as “E (D)” in the attached Form drawings; hereinafter the same shall apply); (d) the 120 square meters of the 120 square meters of the 2nd floor factory in the steel panel and the 2nd floor in the steel frame; and (d) the 366 square meters of the 36th floor of the steel panel and the 2nd floor in the steel frame (the building indicated as “E” in the attached Form drawings); and (e) the 366 square meters of the 36th floor of the factory in the 36th floor in the steel frame and the 2nd warehouse in the instant case.

B. On February 1, 2016, Defendant B leased each of the instant buildings, B, and C to Defendant C by setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 40 million, monthly rent of KRW 1.2 million, and the lease term of KRW 36 months.

C. On April 16, 2016, Defendant B leased the instant building at KRW 10 million and KRW 2 million per month of rent to the Plaintiff.

(2) Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff leased the instant building from Defendant B was excluded from the laboratory of this case, and that the laboratory of this case was leased by Defendant C is not acceptable).

B. On May 13, 2017, the unit of the instant unit was installed in the instant unit and the laboratory, and the two spaces were divided. On May 13, 2017, the unit of the instant unit (hereinafter “the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant fire”). [The grounds for recognition] dispute.

유사 판례

-인천지방법원부천지원 2019.01.29 2017가단111835

-전주지방법원 2018.12.19 2017가단29424

-전주지방법원 2017.06.22 2015나1225

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.10.25 2017가단64289

-수원지방법원 2015.02.10 2012가단99804