The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for six months) that the court below sentenced against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. In the judgment of the court, the defendant appeared to have committed the crime of this case when he was judged, and the fact that the defendant had no record of punishment exceeding the fine due to the same kind of crime or a different kind of crime is favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of this case is committed by falsely stating that the defendant would pay the price to the victim when the electric wire is supplied to the victim although there is no intention or ability to pay the price even if the goods were supplied by the victim. When the defendant was supplied with the electric wire at 34 times through 34 times in the victim's age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the defendant's punishment imposed by the court below is judged to be appropriate and is not unreasonable since it is not too unreasonable for the defendant's assertion that the crime of this case is committed in light of the motive, circumstance, method, etc. of the crime, the crime is not good, and the damage amount is not significant, and the damage is not recovered, even though it is not agreed with the victim. The court below seems to reflect most favorable circumstances, and considering all the sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, and circumstances after crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.