The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for six months) that the court below sentenced against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The following facts are considered in favor of the Defendant: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime; (b) the Defendant made efforts to recover damage, such as accepting and repaying the Defendant’s obligation to the victim with respect to the instant crime; (c) the Defendant has no same criminal record; and (d) the Defendant has been sentenced to a fine related to the violation of the Road Traffic Act three times before and after having been sentenced to a fine, etc.; (b) the instant crime was committed in favor of the Defendant; (c) the Defendant received the operating income of the store from the Defendant using the victim’s trust relationship with the victim’s personal financial account and embezzled and consumed it; (d) the crime was not recovered from damage by the instant crime; (d) the victim did not agree with the victim; (e) the victim’s punishment was sought; (e) the Defendant’s recommendation for the instant crime according to the sentencing guidelines set by the Sentencing Committee for the Punishment of the Supreme Court was either four months or one year, or more; and (e) the Defendant’s motive to commit the instant crime and its circumstances were unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, in the case of the judgment of the court below, the third through the sixth column of the application of the Acts and subordinate statutes is in light of the order of the court below.