Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving B rocketing taxi.

On August 16, 2017, the Defendant driven the above taxi at around 03:40 on August 16, 2017, and made a left turn to the left of the four-lane road in front of the city of Speaker C from the high side of new valleys.

Since there is a three-distance intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive a motor vehicle in accordance with the signals by reducing speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went to the left immediately after the rapid turn of the ongoing signal even though it was a green straight signal, and received the part of the victim's DNA driving in front of the right part of the victim's Estststal taxi, which was going to the right part of the said B, which was going to the right part of the said B, from the right side of the said rocketing taxi.

Ultimately, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim D(49) such as cryp dump base, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of treatment on the victim F. (43) who was the passenger of the said E rocketing taxi, with approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of the victim F. (43) who was the passenger of the said E rocketing other taxi, and suffered injury, such as cryp fry and chump frys, etc., which require approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of the victim G (25) who was the passenger of the said B rocketing other taxi.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the negligence of the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not less than that of the defendant, there is no criminal history of the defendant, and the degree of injury of the victims is not more severe.