logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.07.14 2017고정436
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

On February 13, 2017, the Defendant driven the above taxi on February 21, 2017, while driving the si-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do along the intersection of the viewing si-dong in Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, in a parallel of two-lanes from the east of the month to the private distance in the new market.

Since there is a long distance intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle in accordance with traffic signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and got the front part of the victim C (64 ) driven by the victim C (64 ) who was directly in accordance with the new code from the left-hand side of the defendant's running direction due to the negligence of the red signal, and was driven by the defendant as the front part of the defendant's taxi in front of the left-hand side of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim E (V, 46 years old), who was on board a taxi driven by the Defendant due to the above occupational negligence, to the victim E (V) who was in need of approximately 3 weeks of medical treatment, such as satisfy in two open areas, as well as satisf and salt satfying and salt satching for about 2 weeks of medical treatment to the victim C, and to the victim F (V, 43 years old), who is the passenger of the taxi driven by the victim C, for about 3 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident report, a report on actual condition investigation, and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to documents submitted by persons involved in traffic accidents;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment for Crime; Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow