The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant was guilty on the ground that there was no misunderstanding of facts (the crime of Article 3 of the original judgment) by deceiving T and U.S. and there was no fact that H (or K) was involved in withdrawing the credit card use fee deposited by U.S. settlement led by H (or K), and the lower court convicted the Defendant by misunderstanding of facts.

B. The sentence of imprisonment (the first crime of the original decision: imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and the second and third crimes of the original decision: imprisonment with prison labor for two years) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, in particular, from the prosecution investigation stage to the court of the court below, and the following circumstances recognized by the statement and each financial transaction details, i.e., from the prosecution investigation stage to the court of the court of the court below consistently, i.e., “T sells a high-end vehicle to the defendant, and is not paid part of the sales proceeds, T may open a mobile card terminal from the defendant.” The so-called 'B-called 'B-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-S