1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasons why the court of the first instance cited this case are stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the supplement of the judgment as to the plaintiff's assertion, which is identical to that of the first instance judgment.

Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be quoted as it is.

2. The Plaintiff asserts that there has been a proximate causal relationship between the Plaintiff’s work and the outbreak of the instant cerebral blood.

However, the submitted evidence alone exceeded the level normally required by the Plaintiff until the outbreak of the instant cerebral blood.

It is difficult to recognize that there has been serious mental stress in the course of business to the extent that it may cause cerebrovasculars.

Rather, the Plaintiff worked for about 10 years as a manager of the instant her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

In addition, the Plaintiff asserts to the effect that the cerebrovascular of this case cannot be deemed to have been caused due to the aggravation of natural progress because it did not have any high blood pressure due to low-tension, but it is insufficient to recognize it only by the descriptions of No. 5 (including virtual numbers).

Furthermore, the plaintiff asserts that even if the plaintiff had a risk factor of high blood pressure, such high blood pressure also exists a proximate causal relation with the plaintiff's work.

However, the plaintiff's occupational department was serious.

Unless there is any evidence to prove that mental stress or excessive psychological stress has been found, this part of the argument based on the premise is difficult to accept.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is without merit.

3. The instant disposition is lawful, and the Plaintiff’s claim should be dismissed due to the lack of reasonable grounds.

The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable in conclusion as above.

Therefore, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.