logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.02.15 2015고단7232
영유아보육법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the 2016 Highest 4415 fraud and fraud in the instant case.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From March 4, 1999, the Defendant operated the F Child Care Center in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon.

1. From March 2009 to February 2, 2015, the Defendant entered the child care integration system in a false manner as if he/she had worked normally as a child care teacher, even though his/her father G from the above child care center had not worked as a child care teacher, and then had the staff in charge of the child care policy in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City deposit KRW 18,087,020 for G personnel expenses into the flood savings account, etc. for the above child care center operation account, and received subsidies by fraud or other improper means.

2. The Defendant employed a cook H from January 2013 to November 2013, and had H submit an account, which is his/her wage account, while having him/her pay KRW 900,00 per month, and entered the childcare integration system as if he/she would have paid a monthly salary of KRW 1,858,00 in a false manner, and then had the employee in charge of the above childcare policy and the employee in charge of the above childcare policy deposit KRW 11,858,00 for H with the above fisheries cooperative account over 11 times as shown in the attached Table of Crimes (Ⅱ) as in the attached Table of Crimes (Ⅱ), paid KRW 9,00,000 after having him/her pay the remainder of KRW 1,958,00 in a false or other unjust manner.

3. The Defendant, while employing I as a cook at the above childcare center from September 2014 to December 2014, had I submit the Suhyup account, which is the women’s wage account, and had I pay KRW 900,000 per month, but entered the childcare integration system as if he paid a salary equivalent to salary No. 1 of the fixed cook in the childcare integration system, and then had the employee in charge of the above childcare policy and the employee in charge of the above childcare policy enter it falsely as if he would have paid a salary equivalent to salary No. 1 of the fixed cook in the childcare integration system.

arrow