1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The court's explanation concerning the instant case is based on the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

B. The part of Paragraph 2 (2) (the last 3rd eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e) was used) is identical to the part of the judgment of the court of first instance.

In general, it cannot be deemed that the possessor expressed his/her intent to waive the extinctive prescription interest in light of the fact that the possessor offered such a proposal for purchase, even after the completion of the extinctive prescription, in light of the fact that the possessor attempted to purchase in order to resolve a dispute with the owner.

(C) As to the instant case, the health stand, Eul evidence Nos. 4 through 12 (including virtual numbers) (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 85Meu771, Feb. 25, 1986) (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 85Meu771, Feb. 25, 1986); 1) pursuant to the overall purport of each entry and pleading, the Defendant provided the Plaintiff with prior notice of State property and guidance to enter into a loan agreement with respect to the instant land on Nov. 12, 2008; 31, Dec. 31, 2008; 201.