logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.05.26 2016고정30
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 14, 2015, at around 06:45, Defendant A driven a Dystren car in the section of approximately 500 meters from the front of the 205-dong, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-dong, to the front of the construction site of Twit apartment.

2. On August 28, 2015, Defendant B, at the guard of the Daejeon East Police Station and the traffic and E office of the Daejeon East Police Station, Defendant B, despite having driven without a license, made a false statement to the assistantF belonging to the said police station investigating the said case to the effect that he/she was driving the said vehicle and that A was not driving the said vehicle, and that he/she was not driving the said vehicle, thereby escapeing the said A who committed a crime equivalent to a fine or heavier punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the witness G (the legal statement of the witness G) is specific and consistent and credibility.

Witness

H Ha first landed from the chief of the troke, and then go to the trokele at the time of leaving the trokele, and thereafter the police cars arrive.

The police officer G also stated that Defendant A sent a bitle distance to the bitle line, and Defendant B did not see it.

The statements are inconsistent with the above statements.

Witness

A's legal statement that he did not enter the house as in the wind which is close to B and the preceding day, and that he did not go separately.

However, there is no benefit in the part that the next day was promised to keep on the ambling before the ambling.

Witness

A, after having arrived at the parking lot, made a statement to the effect that A, after having arrived at the parking lot, he was able to listen to music with a mixed earphone within the extent of 3 minutes, and the police was able to arrive at the parking lot. A made a statement to the effect that B and B were able to remain at the same time within 3 minutes and stayed at the same time.

In this process, if A and B were almost at the same time, G does not have any way to see B.

As above, each legal statement of a witness A and H cannot be contradictory and consistent to each other, and cannot be trusted in conflict with the legal statement of a witness G.

1. Defendant ..

arrow